Since late 1989,
the Indian State of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K)
has been in the grip of a vicious movement of
Islamist extremist terrorism. As many as 36,289
[till December 30, 2003, Source: www.satp.org]
lives have been lost in this conflict over nearly
14 years of a sub-conventional war that has inflicted
enormous suffering on the people of the State,
and transformed this confrontation between South
Asia's traditional rivals into a potential nuclear
flashpoint.
Among the worst
victims of this conflict are the Kashmiri Pandits,
descendents of Hindu priests and among the original
inhabitants of the Kashmir Valley, with a recorded
history of over 5,000 years. Over the millennia,
this community has been integral not only to the
cultural and intellectual life of the people of
this region, but the bulwark of its administration
and economic development as well. The Pandits
have now become the targets and victims of one
of the most successful, though little-known, campaigns
of ethnic cleansing in the world. Pogroms of a
far lesser magnitude in other parts of the world
have attracted international attention, censure
and action in support of the victim communities,
but this is an insidious campaign that has passed
virtually unnoticed, and on which the world remains
silent. Among the complex reasons for this neglect
is, perhaps, the nature of this community itself:
where other campaigns of ethnic cleansing have
invariably provoked at least some retaliatory
violence, the deep tradition and culture of non-violence
among the Kashmiri Pandits has made them accept
their suffering in silence, with not a single
act of retaliatory violence on record.
January 19, 2003, marked
thirteen years since what is generally recognized
as the beginning of this process of ethnic cleansing
as a result of which the Kashmiri Pandits were
hounded out of the Kashmir Valley. On this day
in 1990, a Kashmiri Pandit nurse working at the
Soura Medical College Hospital in Srinagar was
raped and later killed by Pakistan-backed terrorists.
The incident was preceded by massacres of Pandit
families in the Telwani and Sangrama villages
of Budgam district and other places in the Kashmir
Valley. While the Jammu & Kashmir Liberation
Front (JKLF) claimed a 'secular' agenda of liberation
from Indian rule, the terrorist intent was clearly
to drive non-Muslim 'infidels' out of the State
and establish Nizam-e-Mustafa (literally, the
Order of the Prophet; government according to
the Shariah). Accounts of Pandits from this traumatic
period reveal that it was not unusual to see posters
and announcements ? including many articles and
declarations in local newspapers ? telling them
to leave the Valley. Pandit properties were either
destroyed or taken over by terrorists or by local
Muslims, and there was a continuous succession
of brutal killings, a trend that continues even
today.
Ethnic cleansing was
evidently a systematic component of the terrorists'
strategic agenda in J&K, and estimates suggest
that, just between February and March 1990, 140,000
to 160,000 Pandits had fled the Kashmir Valley
to Jammu, Delhi, or other parts of the country.
Simultaneously, there were a number of high-profile
killings of senior Hindu officials, intellectuals
and prominent personalities. Eventually, an estimated
400,000 Pandits ? over 95 per cent of their original
population in the Valley ? became part of the
neglected statistic of 'internal refugees' who
were pushed out of their homes as a result of
this campaign of terror. Not only did the Indian
state fail to protect them in their homes, successive
governments have provided little more than minimal
humanitarian relief, and this exiled community
seldom features in the discourse on the 'Kashmir
issue' and its resolution.
A majority of the Pandit
refugees live in squalid camps with spiralling
health and economic problems. Approximately 2,17,000
Pandits still live in abysmal conditions in Jammu
with families of five to six people often huddled
into a small room. Social workers and psychologists
working among them testify that living as refugees
in such conditions has taken a severe toll on
their physical and mental health. Confronted with
the spectre of cultural extinction, the incidence
of problems such as insomnia, depression and hypertension
have increased and birth rates have declined significantly.
A 1997 study based on inquiries at various migrant
camps in Jammu and Delhi revealed that there had
been only 16 births compared to 49 deaths in about
300 families between 1990 and 1995, a period during
which terrorist violence in J&K was at a peak.
The deaths were mostly of people in the age group
of 20 to 45. Causes for the low birth rates were
primarily identified as premature menopause in
women, hypo-function of the reproductive system
and lack of adequate accommodation and privacy.
Doctors treating various Kashmiri Pandit patients
assert that they had aged physically and mentally
by 10 to 15 years beyond their natural age, and
that there was a risk that the Pandits could face
extinction if current trends persist. On the conditions
at the camps, one report stated that, at the Muthi
camp on the outskirts of Jammu where a large number
of the Pandits stayed after migration from the
Valley, a single room was being shared by three
generations. In certain cases at other places,
six families lived in a hall separated by partitions
of blankets or bed
sheets.
Worse, the dangers of
this ethnic cleansing are also making inroads
into the Muslim dominated areas along the Line
of Control and the international border in the
Jammu region as well, with Islamist terrorists
specifically targeting Hindus in these areas.
There is now a steady flow of migration of Hindus
from the rural and remote areas of the Jammu region
towards Jammu city, and these trends accelerate
after each major terrorist outrage.
The Pandits have rejected
rehabilitation proposals that envision provision
of jobs if the displaced people returned to the
Valley, indicating that they were not willing
to become 'cannon-fodder' for politicians who
cannot guarantee their security. The Pandits insist
that they will return to the Valley only when
they ? and not these 'others' ? are able to determine
that the situation is conducive to their safety.
"We cannot go back in the conditions prevailing
in Kashmir. We will go back on our own terms,"
Kashmiri Samiti president Sunil Shakdher said
in August 2002 in response to the then Farooq
Abdullah regime's proposed rehabilitation agenda.
At the minimum level, these terms would include
security to life and property and, at a broader
level, a consensual rehabilitation scheme.
The Pandits appear fully
justified in their reluctance to fall for the
succession of 'rehabilitation schemes' that are
periodically announced. Any proposal to return
the Pandits to the Valley in the past has usually
been followed by targeted terrorist attacks. Whenever
any attempt to facilitate their return to the
Valley has been initiated, a major incident of
terrorist violence against them has occurred.
The massacre of 26 Pandits at Wandhama, a hamlet
in the Ganderbal area of the Valley on the intervening
night of January 25-26, 1998; the earlier killing
of eight others at Sangrampora in Budgam district
on March 22, 1997; the massacre of 26 Hindus at
Prankote in Udhampur District on April 21, 1998;
and the killing of 24 Kashmir Pandits at the Nadimarg
Village, District Pulwama, on March 23, 2003;
these are the worst of the many examples of the
terrorists' tactic to block any proposal for the
return of migrants to the Valley. These massacres
and a continuous succession of targeted individual
killings have ensured the failure of every proposal
to resolve the problem of the exiled Pandits.
It was, again, this pervasive insecurity that
led to the collapse of the proposal to create
13 clusters of residential houses in 'secure zones'
in different parts of Anantnag for the return
and rehabilitation of Kashmiri Pandit migrants
from outside the Valley in April 2001.
The current Chief Minister
Mufti Mohammed Sayeed, addressing his maiden press
conference at Srinagar on November 3, 2002, said
that the rehabilitation of migrant Pandits was
one of his government's 'top priorities'. The
Pandits, however, regard the Sayeed regime's 'healing
touch' policy with great scepticism. The regime's
decision to release a number of terrorists and
secessionists on bail and the proposal to hold
talks "without any
pre-conditions" with a mélange of
groups actively pursuing the agenda of violence
has led a section of the Pandit community to believe
that the State government, "is turning a
blind eye to our plight?"
For a majority of the
displaced Kashmiris, the recent State Legislative
Assembly elections held little meaning. Panun
Kashmir ('Our Kashmir' ? a leading organisation
of the displaced Kashmiri Pandits), during the
run-up to the State Legislative Assembly elections
in year 2002, had dismissed the exercise as 'meaningless'.
They said the Election Commission's decision to
make arrangements for Hindu migrants to vote from
outside J&K would institutionalise their migrant
status. "The move to allow migrant Hindu
Pandits to vote at their respective refugee camps
only reinforces the mindset that there are no
chances for them to return to their homes, ever,"
said Shakdher.
A section of
the Pandits have demanded a geo-political re-organisation
of the State and the carving of a separate homeland
for them. While such an extreme suggestion may
arise out of the increasing desperation of a
people whose plight has been ignored for nearly
a decade and a half, the idea itself is fraught
with the imminent danger of playing into the
hands of religious extremists who seek a division
of the State along religious lines.
Their relatively small
numbers, coupled with a tradition of non-violent
protest, has made the Pandits largely irrelevant
in the political discourse ? both within the
country and internationally ? on Kashmir. It
should be clear, however, that the many 'peace
processes' and 'political solutions' that are
initiated in J&K from time to time have
little meaning until these include some steps
to correct the grave injustices done to this
unfortunate community.