People's
Tribunal indicts State of Orissa for Christian,
Muslim persecution
Justice Usha said: “As
elsewhere in India, these groups
legitimise their actions against minorities by
invoking specific and
fabricated threats to Hindus from Muslims and
Christiansâ€.
Indian People's Tribunal on
Communalism in Orissa releases its report, revealing
alarming levels of sectarian organising in the
state.
4 October 2006
Bhubaneswar, Orissa, and New Delhi: The Indian
People's Tribunal on Communalism in Orissa [IPTCO]
released its report on the role of majoritarian
communal groups in perpetrating communal violence,
criminal activity, and human rights violations
across the state. The Tribunal was constituted
in response to concerns voiced by citizens over
the growth of communalism and increased aggression
throughout Orissa particularly since the Gujarat
2002 genocide. In June 2005, the IPTCO commissioned
its inquiry to gage the strength, reach, and impact
of fundamentalist groups in the state. The report
is the culmination of nearly twenty months of
investigative work and research. Lead by Justice
K.K. Usha (Former Chief Justice of the Kerala
High Court), the Tribunal was convened by Dr.
Angana Chatterji (Associate Professor at the California
Institute of Integral Studies) and Advocate Mihir
Desai (Mumbai High Court).
The Indian People's Tribunal
on Environment and Human Rights was constituted
by a people's mandate in 1993 to investigate into
human rights violations and cases of environmental
degradation. The IPT is particularly concerned
about cases that affect the lives and livelihood
of a vast majority of urban and rural poor. The
IPT process endeavours to inquire into the exact
nature of a problem, and provide a true picture
by providing a space for all the concerned parties
to present their views.
Edited by Dr. Chatterji and Advocate
Desai, the 80-page report of the Tribunal on Communalism
in Orissa is entitled 'Communalism in Orissa'.
IPTCO's report describes the formidable extent
of mobilization by the majoritarian communalist
group of organisations in Orissa. According to
the report, the Sangh Parivar group of Hindutva,
Hindu supremacist, organisations has a visible
presence in twenty-five of thirty districts in
Orissa. The Sangh Parivar's cadre in Orissa currently
numbers several million, and constitutes the largest
voluntary effort in the state.
Justice Usha said: “As
elsewhere in India, these groups legitimise their
actions against minorities by invoking specific
and fabricated threats to Hindus from Muslims
and Christiansâ€.
Dr. Chatterji stated: “In
Orissa, the Sangh Parivar has successfully established
centres at every level of civic life, ranging
from villages to cities. The Sangh Parivar operates
through thirty-five primary organizations, including
ideological, service, and charitable institutions,
militant and educational groups, trade unions
and student unions, political and women's organizationsâ€.
Advocate Desai stated: “IPTCO's
findings reveal that majoritarian communal organizations
have consolidated their power, using violence
to target women, religious and sexual minorities,
along with disenfranchised caste, class, ethnic,
and other social groupsâ€.
The Tribunal's report documents
in considerable detail how the cadre of majoritarian
communal organisations is recruited and indoctrinated
in hatred and violence against other communities
that it has defined as inherently “inferiorâ€.
Of particular concern, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak
Sangh (RSS) has set up developmental centres across
the state, establishing training camps where military
exercises are performed as public display, as
well as a network of educational institutions
promoting right-wing ideologies. Prioritizing
areas where the government has failed to provide
functioning public schools, these groups have
capitalised on the acute desire for accessible
state institutions and accountability among the
populace. This cadre, according to the IPTCO report,
uses coercion and force to promote Hindu supremacy
and hegemony. Dr. Chatterji added: “Forcible
conversions to dominant Hinduism, social and economic
boycotts, tonsuring, physical intimidation and
violence, arson, and even murder are the weapons
that Sangh Parivar cadre wields to intimidate
and target disenfranchised groups and religious
minorities such as Adivasis, Dalits, Christians,
and Muslimsâ€. Given the dire
situation in the state, the IPTCO recommends that
the Government of India and Government of Orissa
treat communalism in the state as an emergency
and accord it immediate attention to prevent further
violations and injustices.
Justice Usha added: “IPTCO
understands its mandate to investigate communalism
as being a constitutional one, delineated in Article
51A, Clause E which specifies the fundamental
responsibilities of citizensâ€.
Article 51A, Clause E states that: “to
promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood
amongst all the people of India transcending religious,
linguistic and regional or sectional diversitiesâ€
and “to renounce practices derogatory
to the dignity of women†(IPTCO,
pages 3). This obligation, their report notes,
is reinforced by the Indian Penal Code-specifically
provisions in Section 152A, 153B, 295-298, and
505-which prescribe criminal prosecution for persons
promoting enmity on sectarian or economic grounds,
who are, thus, undermining national integration.
Indeed, the report warns that if the communalisation
of Orissa is €œindicative of the future
of the nation, then the signs are truly ominous
for India's democratic futureâ€
(IPTCO, pages 70).
Advocate Desai stated: “In
addition to documenting communalism's reach in
Orissa, IPTCO was launched as an injunctive mechanism
to help formulate remedial and preventive action
for human rights abuses in the futureâ€.
The primary investigations consisted of meeting
with persons and communities, targeted by majoritarian
communal groups and those who have suffered abuse
in the context of majoritarian communalism such
as public lynching, rape, tonsuring, economic
boycotts, segregation and discrimination. These
meetings were held across Orissa in the Bhadrak
District, Jagatsinghpur District, Keonjhar District,
Phulbani District, and Bhubaneswar, and included,
in addition to Justice Usha, Dr. Chatterji, and
Advocate Desai, Dr. Asha Hans (former Professor
at Utkal University), Ms. Lalita Missal (National
Alliance of Women, Orissa chapter), Dr. Ram Puniyani
(Ekta, Committee for Communal Amity), and scholar-activists
Dr. Shaheen Nilofer and Mr. Sudhir Pattnaik. The
Tribunal also interviewed members of the state
government and other state agencies, opposition
leaders, police and political parties, individuals
associated with educational institutions, non-governmental
organizations, Dalit and Adivasi leaders, rights
groups, activists, academics, journalists, and
local religious leaders from Christian, Muslim,
Hindu groups, as well as communal groups. IPTCO
culled its evidence from a variety of sources
including official documents, depositions, affidavits,
signed statements, visual documentation, sworn
personal and group testimonies, and expert witnesses.
Claims by individuals and groups were crutinized
by the Tribunal and corroborated through other
sources such as conducting additional interviews
and securing further documentary evidence.
The Tribunal's report delineates recommendations
for procedures and mechanisms to determine state
and collective responsibility and accountability.
Some of the general recommendations include:
1. A call for the Central Bureau of Investigation
to investigate the activities of the Bajrang Dal,
Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), and RSS under the
Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.
2. To establish a review panel appointed by the
Government of Orissa, in consultation with the
National Human Rights Commission, the National
Minorities Commission, and other independent bodies
such as the People's Union for Democratic Rights
and the People's Union for Civil Liberties, to
identify and investigate the actions and finances
of communal groups.
3. That communal groups be investigated and monitored.
When appropriate, requisite action should be taken
to safeguard minorities against the actions of
these groups, and reparations should be made retroactively
to communities and individuals who have suffered
as a consequence of the actions of these groups.
4. The Government of Orissa and the Central Government
should make a concerted effort to investigate
and eradicate paramilitary hate camps operated
by the communal groups.
5. The charitable status and privileges of certain
organizations such as the VHP and Vanavasi Kalyan
Ashram, which are registered as charities, should
be reviewed given the nature of their activities.
6. The disparagement, demonisation, and vilification
of any religion should be statutorily prohibited
and punishable under the Indian Penal Code.
7. The repeal of the Orissa Freedom of Religion
Act, 1967, which has been used by communal groups
to target and prohibit voluntary conversion within
minority communities.
8. That the Government of India and the Government
of Orissa safeguard the right of individuals who
convert voluntarily to practice their religion.
9. That the police and courts act immediately
and authoritatively to stop communalists from
forcibly converting or reconverting individuals
to Hinduism. The police should be required to
submit regular and public reports on their work.
10. That the police establish a special desk for
registering minority grievances and filing First
Information Reports.
11. That the Government of Orissa appoint Special
Public Prosecutors to conduct proceedings as necessary.
12. That the trishul (trident) be categorised
as a weapon and its mass distribution be prohibited
under the Arms Act of 1959.
13. That the Orissa Prevention of Cow Slaughter
Act, 1960 -- which has been used against minorities
and the economically disenfranchised in the cattle
trade--should be reviewed.
Finally, while the Tribunal affirms the view that
the “state is accountable for
safeguarding human rightsâ€,
it also urges individual citizens to recognize
their duty to respond to violations and “to
challenge the existing culture of impunity that
generally protects perpetrators of communal violence
from prosecution†(IPTCO, pages
69-70), cautioning that it will take the combined
efforts of both to dismantle the formidable infrastructure
of fear and intimidation erected by these groups.
Contacts:
Convenors of the Indian People's Tribunal on Communalism
in Orissa:
Dr. Angana Chatterji at 00-91-99377 70819 [until
4 October pm];
001-415-640 4013 or 415-575 6119; or achatterji@ciis.edu
Advocate Mihir Desai at iptindia@vsnl.net
|